Contemporary Art Essays - Pop Artists, Otaku, Takashi Murakami

Contemporary Art Essays - Pop Artists, Otaku, Takashi Murakami Contemporary Art Contemporary Art Compare and Contrast Writing Assignment The three contemporary pieces of art that I decided to compare and contrast all come from one artist, contemporary Japanese artist Takashi Murakami. I came across this artist years ago after listing to Kanye West 3rd album The Graduation. I was so impressed by the album cover art work I decided to look up the artist and found out Takashi was much more than just a drawer, he is a painter a sculptor and an over all creative genius when it comes to his different forms of contemporary media. He creates a world of cartoon like creatures using vivid colors almost remind me of a cartoon representation of a really crazy acid or mushroom experience. His art gallery entitled EGO showcased the different forms of art Takashi can create, I chose a painting, a sculpture and an installation that I will compare and contrast from his exhibition. Takashis painting titled Mr. DOB was created with acrylic paint on canvas. It is a 2D art piece with a composition give depth to the creatures drawn in the painting. Takashi draws the main figure high up and puts other creatures in the foreground so you can get the perception that youre looking up at this massive creature he created. He used very vibrant colors like teal blue, bright pink and yellow, the world and beasts he created are fictional so the odd colors make them stand out and give them their own worldly feel. Mr. DOB is very abstract, although the characters are completely made up, he paints them in a way that you can still relate their actions to a feeling. The painting gives me a sense of death, although it is a very bright piece, it is very chaotic and the creatures seem to be shooting each other or at war. Flower Matango was a piece he created as an installation for his gallery. It consist of bright abstract smiling-flower wallpaper on the walls and floor, a painting and a matching smiling-flower sculpture in the center as its main focal point, that was created to fit the entire space. This installation was made to engulf you as you experience it. All the flowers are very colorful, five pedal flowers with a smile face for the center. Theres really no limit on the colors used to create the flowers, the brighter the color the better. The sculpture is made of soft cotton stuffed pillows figures that the exact same flower pieces as the painting and wallpaper, just 3D. In this insulation he utilized both the 3D and 2D components of art expression. This installation although visually bright like his painting Mr. DOB conveys a very different message. Where the other once is pure chaos this piece is sure joy. Every flower created whether painted or sculpted all have a small face. I feel as if the subject matter is that we as society smile to one another and think were individuals when really, were all the same. He represents thats with all the flowers being different colors, but they all look alike and every single one has the exact same smile. It almost gives off a sense of fakeness. The third media is a 20-foot 3D inflatable sculpture of him titled by his first name Murakami. It is an exact replica of the artist himself. The focal point of this peace would be his large 4 foot hand reaching out as to be giving or reactive something form the views. He created himself sitting with he legs crossed, I feel that keeps your eyes circling the sculpture and you look at it. Unlike the rest of his artwork being very bright and conceptual this sculpture is very realistic; from the facial structure to the skin tones colors and hair and clothing, everything seems to be ordinary. I believe he created this piece as the headline of his EGO exhibit. Ego is a persons sense of self-importance or self-esteem, to create a giant, precise reproduction of himself, I believe is a way of him acknowledging how great he is at his craft and being self aware of the creative abilities he possesses. The three art pieces contain many similarities and

Red Flag Laws Definition

Red Flag Laws Definition Red flag laws are gun violence prevention laws that allow courts to order the temporary confiscation of firearms from persons deemed to pose a risk to others or themselves. Key Takeaways: Red Flag Laws Red flag laws are state gun violence prevention laws which allow police to confiscate firearms from persons deemed by a court to pose a risk to others or themselves.As of August 2019, 17 states and the District of Columbia had enacted red flag laws.After deadly mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, President Trump and a bipartisan group of Congress members have indicated their support for red flag laws. Along with gun control proposals, such as universal gun-buyer background checks, raised in the aftermath of shootings like those in Sandy Hook, Parkland, El Paso, and Dayton, demands to enact â€Å"red flag† laws have become common. As of August 2019, 17 states and the District of Columbia had enacted red flag laws. Red Flag Law Definition and Mechanics Red flag laws permit police or family members to ask a state court to order the temporary removal of all firearms from persons believed to present a danger to others or themselves. In deciding to issue such orders, known variously as Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) or Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs), the courts consider the past actions and statements- including those posted on social media outlets- made by the gun owner in question. If the court decides to issue the order, the gun owner must surrender all firearms to the police for a specified period of time. In addition, the person named in the order is banned from buying or selling guns during that period. Refusing to fully comply with a red flag protective order is a criminal offense. Guns seized under the order are returned to the owner after a set period of time unless that period is extended by the court. Examples of evidence required by the courts to justify granting gun confiscation orders include: A recent act or threat of violence (involving a firearm or not)Evidence of serious mental illnessHistory of domestic violenceReckless use of a firearmEvidence of substance abuse or alcoholismSworn testimony by witnesses The specific legal provisions of red flag laws and how they are enforced vary from state to state. Are Red Flag Laws Effective? Connecticut was one of the first states to enact a red flag law in 1999. According to a 2016 study published in the journal of Law and Contemporary Problems, the 762 gun removals under Connecticuts â€Å"risk warrant† law from October 1999 through June 2013 resulted in one suicide prevented for every ten to eleven gun seizures executed. The study concluded that â€Å"enacting and implementing laws like Connecticut’s civil risk warrant statute in other states could significantly mitigate the risk posed by that small proportion of legal gun owners who, at times, may pose a significant danger to themselves or others.† Are Red Flag Laws Constitutional? Many gun-rights advocates say that red flag laws infringe on gun owners’ Second Amendment right to â€Å"keep and bear arms,† as well as their right to due process of law as provided by the U.S. Constitution. Guns, they argue, are personal property, and both the Fifth and 14th Amendments specifically provide that the government- including the courts and police- may not deprive citizens of property without due process of law. The argument is based on the fact that the court hearings held to decide if an individual poses a threat are held ex parte, meaning that the person whose guns might be temporarily confiscated is not present at the hearing. This, critics say, violates the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of the right of accused persons to a face-to-face confrontation with witnesses against them.   However, hearings on all types of restraining and protective orders are typically held ex parte out of concern for the safety of the complainant and witnesses.   Red Flag Law Debate A Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted in April 2018 found that 85% of registered voters nationwide support laws that would â€Å"allow the police to take guns away from people who have been found by a judge to be a danger to themselves or others.† States with red flag laws have reported similar levels of public support for the legislation. In March 2018, the National Rifle Association (NRA), which had helped defeat red flag legislation in Utah and Maryland, suggested it might be open to such laws under a strict set of conditions, including a court finding by â€Å"clear and convincing evidence that the person in question poses a significant risk of danger. Despite this statement, the NRA went on to help block red flag legislation in Arizona in 2019. In Congress, virtually all Democrats and a few Republicans are receptive to red flag laws. The day after the mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, killed 31 people, President Donald Trump urged states to implement red flag laws to remove guns from â€Å"those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety.† In televised remarks from the White House on August 5, 2019, Trump stated, â€Å"We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms and that if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process.† States With Red Flag Laws As of August 2019, red flag laws had been enacted in 17 states and the District of Columbia. Twelve states enacted red flag laws after the shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, on February 14, 2018, left 17 dead. The states of California, Connecticut, Indiana, Oregon, and Washington, had enacted red flag laws prior to 2018. The 17 states and District of Columbia (in red) that had enacted red flag gun violence prevention laws as of August 2019. Creative Commons With only slight variations, all current red flag laws allow family members and law enforcement to petition a state judge to issue ERPOs directing the confiscation of all guns from the individual they believe poses a threat to their safety. In all cases, the petitioner must present evidence of why the gun owner poses a threat to others, as well as to himself or herself. If the ERPO is granted, the named individual’s guns are confiscated and held by police for a set minimum period, after which the gun owner must prove to the court that he or she no longer poses a risk in order to get their firearms back. Here is a list of who is allowed to request the issuance of an ERPO gun removal order in each state: California: Family, household members, and law enforcementColorado: Family, household members, and law enforcementConnecticut: One state attorney or any two police officersDelaware: Family, household members, and law enforcementDistrict of Columbia: Family, household members, mental health professionals, and law enforcementFlorida: Law enforcement onlyHawaii: Family, household members, teachers, medical professionals, coworkers, and law enforcementIllinois: Family, household members, and law enforcementIndiana: Law enforcement onlyMaryland: Family, household members, certain health professionals, and law enforcementMassachusetts: Family, household members, and law enforcementNevada: Family, household members, and law enforcementNew Jersey: Family, household members, and law enforcementNew York: Family, household members, school administrators, and law enforcementOregon: Family, household members, and law enforcementRhode Island: Law enforcement onlyVermont: State attorneys or the off ice of the state attorney general only Washington: Family, household members, and law enforcement As of August 2019, the state legislatures of Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina were considering red flag legislation. Federal Red Flag Gun Control Legislation In February 2019, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, introduced the Extreme Risk Protection Order Act (S. 506), which would offer grants to assist states in developing red flag laws and make possessing a firearm in violation of a state red flag law a felony violation of federal firearms law. On August 5, 2019- the day after the El Paso and Dayton shootings- conservative Republican Senator Lindsey Graham stated that he would propose bipartisan legislation to encourage more states to adopt red flag laws. Sources and Further Reference Williams, Timothy (August 6, 2019). What Are Red Flag Gun Laws, and How Do They Work? New York Times.Parker, George F. (2015). Circumstances and Outcomes of a Firearm Seizure Law: Marion County, Indiana, 2006-2013. Behavioral Sciences the LawLaGrone, Katie. (July 30, 2018). More than 450 people in Florida ordered to surrender guns months after gun law took effect. WFTS Tampa Bay.Dezenski, Lauren. Trump backs red flag gun laws. What do they actually do? CNN. (August 5, 2019).Lindsey Graham pushes red flag bill to curb gun violence. Politico. (August 5, 2019).